Clothing size deflation made me late.
Jan. 12th, 2003 06:52 pmI saw 170 on the scale this morning, so given my plan this now means that I can wean myself of my diet and go into maintain mode, rather than loose mode, which means I can stop being a calorie counting diet freak and go to the occatioanl resturant with out completely freaking over what to get! Yay! at least until I do this again in a few months. Still got 40 lbs to loose.
I bought a size 10 dress today. However this has nothing to do with the weight I lost and everything to do with the fact that there is size deflation. I've heard about this before, but I never saw it personally or knew the extent. When I was 140 I wore a 14 and maybe the odd 12. Now I walk into Dress Barn (I was desperate) and take the 16 off the rack, thinking this should be my size. No. Ok, try the 12, since there isn't a 14, what? that's too big? the 10? no way. By all rights I should be a 16. That's just way too much change in the past 10 years. It's wrong. Why can't we use numbers that mean things?
This made me late for
no subject
Date: 2003-01-12 05:02 pm (UTC)at the same time, i tried to get some long-sleeve shirts. I tried size small, and the shoulders were way too freaking narrow, and i had to cuff the sleeves twice to make them not too long. apparently i am supposed to have long spindly arms with my knuckles dragging on the ground, and no shoulders.
and pants have turned into a ridiculous difficulty for me too...i' m still pissed off that l.l. bean only goes down to size 4. i fit into their size 12 children's pants, and i KNOW that i am larger right now than i was when i wore size 12 pants when i was 10 or so.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-13 09:46 am (UTC)