I don't understand...
Feb. 14th, 2006 11:21 pmSaturn has announced making a hybrid... SUV... that gets 32mpg highway!!!
Saturn!? WHY!? My non-hybrid, bigger engine SW2 gets 35mpg highway (that's the offical dealer number.)
Next, the low-fat, all candycane diet!
Why do companies who fill a great niche decide to go compete for the big slice of the pie that already has huge number of competetors and destroy everything that was ever good about the company?
Saturn!? WHY!? My non-hybrid, bigger engine SW2 gets 35mpg highway (that's the offical dealer number.)
Next, the low-fat, all candycane diet!
Why do companies who fill a great niche decide to go compete for the big slice of the pie that already has huge number of competetors and destroy everything that was ever good about the company?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 07:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 01:16 pm (UTC)To answer the original statement, tho, Saturn had some corporate reorg several years ago (when Saturn was the most profitable GM company) and since then has tried to go more "mainstream" instead of the niche audience they had. This is why they introduced the L-series and then the Vue, and got rid of the wagon and S-series. Even though I love my SL2, I really don't think I'll buy another Saturn. :(
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 02:56 pm (UTC)I really wish I could have a turbo-diesel. *sigh*. This is the one time I curse california's higher emissions standards - because of those high standards turbo-diesels aren't sold here. Theoretically European standard diesel fuel, which is cleaner, is coming soon, and then they will be able to be sold. Also I do know people who did sketchy things with buying them out of state and registering them elsewhere for some period of time (I don't know if this was 6mo or a year) but that all just seemed like too much hassle to me.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 03:01 pm (UTC)Yea, the new cleaner (low sulfur) diesel fuel should help significantly once we get it.. But that's still a year or more out. :(
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 05:59 pm (UTC)My guess -- she was low on gas & batteries. I have a friend in Berkeley who'll drift into the gas station on batteries alone.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 05:56 pm (UTC)The engine as far as I know is designed to run in a specific set of rpms to save on fuel. The 'leftover' energy (modulo a chunk for running a generator with the torque) from that torque dumps into the batteries.
The implication to my reading is that it'll move the car just fine, but unless you're siphoning off some of the energy it creates to batteries, you're wasting energy. Actually
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 06:37 pm (UTC)My understanding of most hybirds is that you take two engines, both with very different power curves (the gas is good at high torque output, the electric effecient at running at high speeds (I think)) and then you have them only run at the most efficent place at their power curve, trading power between the two when one is better than the other. That is to say if you were eccelerating all the time, you'd want the combustion engine.
And as for your comment on regnerative breaking. I think it would also count for a lot anywhere with a lot of stop lights. One does an awful lot of breaking on city streets.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 05:16 pm (UTC)